ClinicalTrials.gov
public full text
Public Domain
The Efficiency of HHHFNC Between Unheated Oxygen Therapy in Difficult Weaning Patients After Extubation in RCC
The purpose of this study is to assess the efficacy of Heated Humidified High-Flow Nasal Cannula compared with noninvasive positive-pressure ventilation in the prevention of extubation failure in patients with prolonged mechanical ventilation.
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Discomfort of noninvasive ventilation, high flow nasal cannula oxygen, and conventional oxygen implemented after extubation in non-COPD patients#971119
- The Effectiveness of High Flow Nasal Cannula Versus Noninvasive Ventilation and Conventional Oxygen Therapy#849290
- Postextubation Management in Patients at Risk for Extubation Failure#911225
- EXtubation With SUctioning or With Positive End-Expiratory Pressure in Intensive Care Unit#891867
- HFNC vs NPPV After Early Extubation for Patients With COPD#907381
Record · ID 850471
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive