ClinicalTrials.gov
public full text
Public Domain
Baseline V-RESOLVE Score Guided Versus Angiography Guided Stent Implantation in Coronary Bifurcation Lesions (CIT-RESOLVE II)
The purpose of this study is to investigate whether baseline V-RESOLVE score guided intervention is associated with significant reduction of side branch occlusion rates compared to angiography guided intervention in patients with coronary bifurcation lesions.
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- The European Bifurcation Club Left Main Study#1102441
- IVUS VS CAG Guided PCI for Patients With LMB Lesion#893176
- Drug Coated Balloon for Side Branch Treatment vs. Conventional Approach in True Bifurcation Coronary Disease: PRO-DAVID#1075290
- PREcise Percutaneous Coronary Intervention for Stent OptimizatION in Treatment of COMPLEX Lesion (PRECISION-COMPLEX)#835654
- Does Optical Coherence Tomography Optimise Results of Stenting#1044356
Record · ID 851432
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive