ClinicalTrials.gov
public full text
Public Domain
IVUS VS CAG Guided PCI for Patients With LMB Lesion
To compare the 3 - year clinical follow - up results of patients with left main bifurcation lesions treated by intravascular ultrasound(IVUS) - guided and coronary angiography(CAG) - guided percutaneous coronary intervention(PCI), and to confirm the clinical benefits of optimizing interventional therapy of left main bifurcation lesions by intravascular ultrasound(IVUS).
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- The European Bifurcation Club Left Main Study#1102441
- Baseline V-RESOLVE Score Guided Versus Angiography Guided Stent Implantation in Coronary Bifurcation Lesions (CIT-RESOLVE II)#851432
- Two-stent vs Provisional Stenting Techniques for Patients With Complex Coronary Bifurcation Lesions#1033511
- Intravascular imaging to guide percutaneous coronary intervention of complex lesions: time to renovate guidelines?#644162
- POLish Bifurcation Optimal Stenting Study#829322
Record · ID 893176
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive