ClinicalTrials.gov
public full text
Public Domain
Evaluation of Double Layer Application Using a Universal Adhesive in the Quality of Cervical Lesions Restorations
The aim of this study will be to evaluate the effect of a double layer application of a universal adhesive system used as etch-and-rinse application mode in non-carious cervical lesions (NCCLs), on the 6- and 12-months clinical performance. Materials \& Methods: 144 restorations were randomly placed in 36 subjects (16 male and 20 female) according to the following groups (n=36): ER1 (one layer of Scotchbond Universal Plus adhesive applied as etch-and-rinse mode); ER2 (double layer of Scotchbond Universal Plus adhesive applied as etch-and-rinse mode); SEE1 (one layer of Scotchbond Universal Plus adhesive applied as selective enamel etching); SEE2 (double layer of Scotchbond Universal Plus adhesive applied as selective enamel etching). All groups were light-cured for 10s/1,000 mW/cm2 only after final layer. A resin composite will be placed by applying three increments and each one will be light cured for 20s/1,000 mW/cm2. The restorations will be finished immediately with fine diamond burs and polishers. The restorations will be evaluated at baseline and after 6- and 12-months by using the FDI criteria. The following outcomes will be evaluated: retention, marginal staining, marginal adaptation, post-operative sensitivity and recurrence of caries. The differences among the groups will be calculated using Friedman repeated measures analysis of variance rank (α = 0.05).
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Performance Of Cervical Restorations Using Nitric Acid and Mineral Enriched Adhesive Versus Phosphoric Acid and Universal Adhesive#903702
- 36-Month Clinical Evaluation of a Universal Adhesive#803596
- Clinical Comparison of Different Adhesives in NCCLs#869514
- Self-Cure vs. Highly Filled Flowable Composite in Carious Cervical Lesions: 18-Month RCT#861587
- Clinical Performance of Two HEMA-Free Universal Adhesive Systems#966646
Record · ID 853030
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive