ClinicalTrials.gov
public full text
Public Domain
Single Rotary File System Versus Conventional Manual K-file in Pulpectomy of Primary Molars.
The sample size will be divided between two groups, Group A pulpectomy will be done using single rotary file in primary molars and group B pulpectomy will be done using manual K file system. follow up of the patients and clinical and radiographical success rates of cases will be seen.
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Clinical and Radiographic Success of Pulpotomy Using Neoputty Mineral Trioxide Aggregate Versus Pulpectomy Using Endoflas In Primary Molars With Irreversible Pulpitis: A Randomized Controlled Trial#865134
- Bacterial Reduction of Rotary Versus Manual Filing System Using Different Irrigants in Primary Molars#1008633
- Influence of Working Length Methods in the Performance of Pulpectomies in Primary Teeth#1096976
- Radicular Dentin Remaining, Risk of Perforation and Canal Transportation in Manual Versus Rotary Instrumentation in Primary Molars#1031584
- Global Workflow of a Comanipulation‐Based Robotic System for Cervical Spine Surgery#280269
Record · ID 855667
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive