ClinicalTrials.gov
public full text
Public Domain
Covered Stents Versus Bare-Metal Stents
To compare the outcome of revascularisation the gastrointestinal arteries using covered stents compared to bare-metal stents in patients with CGI.
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- The Clinical Evaluation of the Cinatra™ Corolimus-Eluting Coronary Stent in De Novo Lesions in Native Coronary Arteries#1103360
- Compare the Safety and Effectiveness of Genoss® DCB and SeQuent® Please NEO in Chinese Patients with Coronary ISR#1161880
- Covered Metal Ureteral Stents in the Treatment of Benign Short Ureteral Stricture#1163219
- A Study of the Presillion Stent in de Novo Coronary Lesions#1008481
- Evaluation of the Palmaz Mach-5 Grooved Bare Metal Coronary Stent System Versus the Palmaz Bare Metal Coronary Stent System in Patients With Symptomatic Ischemic Heart Disease: A Safety and Performance Study#892227
Record · ID 861223
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive