ClinicalTrials.gov
public full text
Public Domain
Digital vs Conventional Impression in Capturing the Emergence Profile Around Maxillary Anterior Implant-supported Crowns
This study compares conventional impression and cast fabrication to direct/indirect digital scannig and 3D printed casts regarding their accuracy in replicating the peri-implant emergence profile of single implants in the maxillary anterior region (FDI #15-25).
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Effect of Face Scanning on Accuracy of Dental Implant Placement in Fixed Implant Supported Maxillary Prostheses#831484
- Comparison of Three Final Impression Techniques for Severely Resorbed Mandibular Ridges#1137259
- Lnfluence of the Prosthetic Emergence Profile on the Prevalence of Peri-implant Diseases#810982
- Precision of Complete-arch Digital Implant Impressions With Intraoral Scanning Versus Photogrammetry#802400
- 3D Facial Scanning in Full-Arch Implant Prosthodontics: Time Efficiency and Patient Satisfaction#967320
Record · ID 861551
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive