ClinicalTrials.gov
public full text
Public Domain
Reliability of Central Venous Pressure Measurements
The purpose of this study is to compare CVP measurements from CICCs and PICCs. The investigators will also evaluate whether or not the duration of CICC placement affects the differences in CVP measurements between the CICCs and PICCs. The investigators hypothesize that the differences between the CVP measurements of the CICCs and PICCs will be clinically insignificant.
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Measurement of Cardiac Index Using an Implanted Central Venous Access Port in Patients Scheduled for Oncologic High-risk Surgery#835452
- THERMES ET VEINES: Spa for Prevention of Leg Ulcers#1030947
- A Study to Evaluate Direct Wire Pacing (DWP) for Measuring Fractional Flow Reserve (FFR)#1127979
- Single-lumen 5Fr and Triple-lumen 6Fr PICCs Are Accurate for Hemodynamic Measurement by Transpulmonary Thermodilution.#1171010
- SHERLOCK 3CG™ Diamond Tip Confirmation System#812327
Record · ID 863766
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive