ClinicalTrials.gov
public full text
Public Domain
Comparison of 22-gauge and 19-gauge Aspiration Needle During EBUS-TBNA
Investigators intend to compare the 19-gauge needle and the 22-gauge-needle during EBUS-TBNA concerning the diagnostic yield, the quality and quantity of each biopsy needle without raising the rate of complications.
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Handheld Ultrasound Device to Triage Women With a Positive Clinical Breast Examination by Trained Non-radiologists#1045870
- Safety & Accuracy of the ActiSight Needle Guidance System in Percutaneous Chest Aspiration and Biopsy#802705
- Modified Wet Suction Versus Capillary Techniques for EUS Guided Fine Needle Aspiration and Biopsy of Solid Lesions#839231
- Abdominal Exploration Without Incisions#1174016
- Comparison of EUS-FNB Biopsy Techniques of Solid Pancreatic Lesions#825603
Record · ID 865876
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive