ClinicalTrials.gov
public full text
Public Domain
Anterior Open Bite Treatment With Bonded Spurs Associated With Build-ups Versus Conventional Bonded Spurs
This study compares the dentoalveolar and skeletal effects of bonded spurs associated with build-ups versus conventional bonded spurs in the early treatment of anterior open bite patients. Half of participants will be treated with bonded spurs associated with build-ups, while the other half will be treated with conventional bonded spurs. The null hypothesis to be tested is that there are no differences for the dentoalveolar and skeletal effects between the two protocols.
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- One Year Skeletal and Dental Arch Changes Following Rapid Maxillary Expansion Treatment in Children#852697
- Efficacy of Injectable Platelet Rich Fibrin (i-PRF) in Enhancing Bone Quality#980989
- Pain, Discomfort, and Functional Impairments During Maxillary Expansion#885257
- Dentoskeletal Changes Expansion Using Invisalign Versus Conventional Expander#849028
- Evaluation of Treatment Outcomes With Palatal Plate Versus Conventional Tooth Borne Anchorage in Class III Patients#862433
Record · ID 869019
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive