Comparison of CLSB With Sedation Versus General Endotracheal Anesthesia on Postoperative Outcomes in Elderly Patients Undergoing Hip Fracture Surgery

Hip fracture is a global public health problem. The postoperative mortality and disability rate of hip fracture is high, and early surgery is still the most effective treatment method, but these patients are often associated with concurrent heart and lung and other organ dysfunction, anesthesia and surgery are extremely risky, mainly associated with high incidence of complications in the pulmonary and cardiovascular system, and anesthesia plays a vital role in ensuring that these patients can safely and effectively get through the perioperative period. The research on the relationship between anesthetic methods and hip fracture surgery prognosis mainly focuses on comparison between neuraxial anesthesia (including spinal anesthesia and epidural anesthesia) and general anesthesia with endotracheal intubation until now. In addition to general anesthesia with endotracheal intubation and neuraxial anesthesia, ultrasound-guided lumbar plexus and sciatic nerve block has been widely used in hip fracture surgery in recent years, especially for some high-risk patients with cardiopulmonary dysfunction. However, it is not clear whether ultrasound-guided combined lumbar plexus and sacral plexus block with sedative anesthesia can improve the prognosis of elderly patients with hip fracture, and in this study, we plan to make a prospective, multicenter, randomized controlled clinical trial to compare the effects of general anesthesia with endotracheal intubation and ultrasound-guided combined lumbar plexus and sacral plexus block with sedative anesthesia on the prognosis of elderly patients with hip fracture to clarify the clinical value of combined lumbar plexus and sacral plexus block with sedative anesthesia in elderly patients with hip fracture.