ClinicalTrials.gov
public full text
Public Domain
Robotic Natural Orifice Specimen Extraction Surgery Versus Robotic Transabdominal Specimen Extraction Surgery for Early-Stage Rectal Cancer
A retrospective cohort study, conducted nationwide（China） and across multiple centers, aimed to compare the surgical quality and short-term outcomes of R-NOSES （robotic natural orifice specimen extraction surgery）with R-TSES （robotic transabdominal specimen extraction surgery） for early-stage rectal cancer.
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Nasal dorsum reconstruction in the cutaneous oncology setting#335984
- Comparison of NOSE and Conventional Methods in Laparoscopic Right Colon Surgery#804988
- Safety and Short Term Effectiveness of EEA Versus PPH Stapler for III Degree Hemorrhoids#1100495
- Intracorporeal vs Extracorporeal Urinary Diversion After Robot Assisted Radical Cystectomy#1074099
- ShockPulse-SE vs. Trilogy Trial: Comparing the Performance of Two Intracorporeal Lithotripters for Removal of Large Renal Calculi#866060
Record · ID 878983
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive