ClinicalTrials.gov
public full text
Public Domain
King Vision Video Laryngoscope aBlade vs. Direct Laryngoscopy in Children
The purpose of this study is to determine whether there is a clinically relevant difference in first attempt success rates between the Ambu King Vision Video Laryngoscope and Direct Laryngoscopy in Children.
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Learning Curves for Airtraq Versus King Vision Laryngoscopes#1165160
- Comparison of Video Laryngoscopy Versus Direct Laryngoscopy for Orotracheal Intubation Among Adults in Emergency Department#841972
- Comparison of Different Video Laryngoscopes in a Manikin With Immobilized Cervical Spine#880480
- King Video Laryngoscope Versus Direct Laryngoscopy for Prehospital Intubation: A Randomized Controlled Trial#802302
- Comparison of Different Video Laryngoscopes in Infants Undergoing Neurosurgery: a Prospective Randomized Clinical Trial#966707
Record · ID 880599
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive