ClinicalTrials.gov
public full text
Public Domain
Comparing Arrow PICC Catheters w/ Arrowga+rd Blue Advanced Protection Performance and Safety to Unprotected PICC's
This study seeks to compare the standard unprotected PICC with the AGBA PICC for placement success, incidence of venous thrombosis through duplex ultrasound, observing for signs and symptoms of thrombotic occlusion and recording treatment response when diagnosed by sluggish fluid flow, inability to aspirate blood and or difficulty/inability to infuse via a lumen or lumens of the catheter. The incidence of catheter-related bloodstream infection will also be tracked during the study.
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- 'Living Well With a PICC at Home': Co-Design and Evaluation of a Peripherally Inserted Central Catheter (PICC) Booklet.#4108
- An Observational Study to Assess Safety and Effectiveness of Intravenous NovoRapid® in Hospitalised Subjects#1174111
- Male External Catheters' Comparison of Comfort and Efficacy#805243
- Evaluation of Safety and Tolerability of Nitric Oxide Impregnated Urinary Catheters#18660
- Real-World Registry Assessing the Clinical Use of the Lutonix 035 Drug Coated Balloon Catheter#884218
Record · ID 891807
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive