ClinicalTrials.gov
public full text
Public Domain
IntuBrite Versus Macintosh for Endotracheal Intubation in Out of Hospital Cardiac Arrest
a randomized, parallel, non-blinded trial in a single Emergency Mdeical Service in Poland within a group of 34 ground ambulances crews, comparing time and first pass success (FPS) for endotracheal intubation (ETI) in DL using the IntuBrite® (INT) and Macintosh laryngoscope (MCL) during cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR). intubations will be performed using INT and MCL based on an intention-to-treat analysis. The FPS time of the ETI attempt will be analysed. First attempt success will be counted.
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Safety and Efficacy of Endotracheal Intubation Using Glidescope Video-Laryngoscope#811277
- Intubation During Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation#992575
- The Effect of The Use of a Videolaryngoscope and/or Stylet on Intubation Time in Obese Patients#1125517
- Pediatric Intubation During Emergency Conditions#1163409
- Video Laryngoscope Versus USB Borescope in Difficult Intubation#1008563
Record · ID 891853
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive