ClinicalTrials.gov
public full text
Public Domain
Calistar A vs. Calistar S - Comparative Cohort Retrospective Analysis of Single Incision POP Systems
The main objective of this study is to compare the initial outcomes and complication of two meshes implanted through a single incision to treat anterior and apical prolapses, Calistar A and a second-generation low weight mesh called Calistar S (Soft).
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Pectopexy Surgery Without Mesh#1096192
- Comparison Between Two Types of Meshes Used in Pelvic Organs Prolapse Procedures#1111618
- The Use of Different Types of Mesh for Prevention of Incisional Hernia Versus Primary Abdominal Suturing#1029979
- Bioprosthetic Mesh to Expand the Lower Pole in Tissue Expander Reconstruction#1103685
- Single Incision Pelvic Floor Mesh Implants#992951
Record · ID 900082
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive