ClinicalTrials.gov
public full text
Public Domain
Comparison of Storz C-MAC and D-MAC Orotracheal Intubation Systems in Morbidly Obese Patients
The investigators hypothesize that the D-MAC (Dblade with C-MAC system) may be a suitable alternative device for difficult laryngoscopy and tracheal intubation in morbidly obese patients. The D-MAC will enable superior view of the glottic structures as well as easier endotracheal intubations than the C-MAC blade. This is the first study to investigate the individual and comparative performances of C-MAC and D-MAC in this patient cohort.
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- A Comparative Study of Airtraq Versus Macintosh Laryngoscope for Endotracheal Intubation by First Year Resident#1101781
- Comparison of Intubation Rate of Macintosh Size 2 and 3 Blades in Asian Female: a Randomised Controlled Trial#966430
- Tracheal Intubation in Morbidly Obese (BMI>35) and in Lean (BMI<30) Patients Using McGrath MAC X-Blade#1085465
- VL vs DL in Inexperienced Users: a Pediatric Manikin Study#829572
- McGrath Videolaryngoscopy for Nasotracheal Intubation#845649
Record · ID 900139
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive