ClinicalTrials.gov
public full text
Public Domain
Study Comparing Total Extraperitoneal Patch "TEP" Versus Lichtenstein According Chronic Pain
The purpose of this study is to se if there is a difference regarding chronic pain and sexual dysfunction one and tree years after laparoscopic un fixated preperitoneal mesh versus gold standard open fixated on lay mesh in inguinal hernia surgery. Long term cross-sectional follow-up comparing different instruments for measurement of chronic pain.
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Onstep Versus Lichtenstein, the Onli Trial.#1074742
- Clinical Trial to Compare TAPP (Transabdominal Preperitoneal) vs TEP (Totally Extraperitoneal) y Approach for Women's Inguinal Hernia on an Outpatient Basis#851562
- Laparoscopic Totally Extraperitoneal Inguinal Hernia Repair With Fibrin Glue Versus Tack Mesh Fixation#969571
- Comparison of Self-Fixating vs Non-Fixating Hernia Mesh#825892
- Bilateral vs Unilateral Inguinal Hernia Repairs With an Asymptomatic Inguinal Hernia in Bilateral Hernias#906609
Record · ID 903948
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive