ClinicalTrials.gov
public full text
Public Domain
Clinical Trial to Compare TAPP (Transabdominal Preperitoneal) vs TEP (Totally Extraperitoneal) y Approach for Women's Inguinal Hernia on an Outpatient Basis
Open prospective randomised clinical trial enrolling women who suffer from inguinal or femoral hernia, to evaluate if TEP approach is superior to TAPP concerning postoperative development, principally postoperative pain, with no increase of recurrent hernia at the one-year follow-up visit.
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Study Comparing Total Extraperitoneal Patch "TEP" Versus Lichtenstein According Chronic Pain#903948
- Bilateral vs Unilateral Inguinal Hernia Repairs With an Asymptomatic Inguinal Hernia in Bilateral Hernias#906609
- Nationwide Results on Chronic Pain After Bilateral Transabdominal Preperitoneal Inguinal Hernia Repair (TAPP)#1045267
- Pain and Readmission After Lap IPOM vs. Robotic Ventral Hernia Repair#1094236
- Onstep Versus Lichtenstein, the Onli Trial.#1074742
Record · ID 851562
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive