ClinicalTrials.gov
public full text
Public Domain
Lateral Suspension Versus Sacral Colpopexy POP
The aim of the study will be to compare the SCP and LLS in the management of apical prolapse at 6 weeks, 6 months, 1 year and yearly up to 2 years with the null hypothesis being that no significant differences existed between the two surgical procedures.
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Apical Support During Hysterectomy for Pelvic Organ Prolapse-NSQIP Analysis.#828408
- Prospective Long-term Evaluation of the Efficacy and Safety of Calistar S for Transvaginal Pelvic Organ Prolapse Repair#1113534
- Single Versus Multi-port Robotic Assisted Sacrocolpopexy for Repair of Vaginal Apex Prolapse#1100695
- Sacrospinous Ligament Fixation With Conventional Surgical Instruments in Chinese Apical Prolapse Female Patients#1151484
- LAparoscopic Preventive PRErectal Mesh#856364
Record · ID 907616
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive