ClinicalTrials.gov
public full text
Public Domain
Comparison of Hyperemic Efficacy Between Central and Peripheral Adenosine Infusion for Fractional Flow Reserve (FFR) Measurement
The purpose of this study is to evaluate the safety and effectiveness of the peripheral IV continuous infusion without the insertion of central venous vascular access method in the achievement of steady-state maximal coronary hyperemia compared with the central IV continuous infusion method.
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Physio PCI: Impact of Coronary Angioplasty on Non-hyperaemic Pressure Ratio in Patients With Coronary Artery Disease#1171674
- Novel Adenosine-independent Index of Coronary Artery Stenosis Severity Resting Flow Reserve#830105
- Dual Energy CT for Ischemia Determination Compared to "Gold Standard" Non-Invasive and Invasive Techniques#806910
- Simultaneous Assessment of FFR and SPECT#907328
- A Study to Evaluate Direct Wire Pacing (DWP) for Measuring Fractional Flow Reserve (FFR)#1127979
Record · ID 908903
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive