CanLII
metadata only
Shahid v Sattar
Decided: 2026-09-15. Docket: CA50400. Citation: 2026 BCCA 375 (CanLII). Procedure — Appeals — Reopening appeal — Extraordinary power exercised rarely in interests of justice — Whether extraordinary circumstances justified reopening a dismissed appeal before formal judgment entered — Finality, fairness to opposite party, and judicial resources weighing against reopening — Attempt to reargue points addressed or that could have been addressed, R v Hummel, Johnson v Laing — Application dismissed
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Are-Canada No. 5 Holdings c. 9510-8528 Québec inc.#1090904
- Williams, Application for Set Aside by the Secretary of State for Justice [2024] PBSA 32 (01 July 2024)#356280
- Williams, Application for Set Aside by the Secretary of State for Justice [2024] PBSA 32 (01 July 2024)#356230
- Mr M I Shabir v Vast Healthcare Ltd (England and Wales : Unfair Dismissal) [2026] UKET 1807644/2025 (13 August 2026)#1056429
- Berthold, Re Application for Judicial Review [2026] NIKB 29 (17 June 2026)#307150
Record · ID 928689
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive