NYU Faculty Digital Archive
metadata only
RATIO-SCALE ELICITATION OF DEGREES OF BELIEF
Most research on rule-based inference under uncertainty has focused on the normative validity and efficiency of various belief-update algorithms. In this paper we shift the attention to the inputs of these algorithms, namely, to the degrees of beliefs elicited from domain experts. Classical meth
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- COMPARING THE VALIDITY OF ALTERNATIVE BELIEF LANGUAGES: AN EXPERIMENTAL APPROACH#933486
- Norms of Belief and Non-Propositional Primal Beliefs#717649
- A Comparative Analysis of the Empirical Validity of Two Rule Based Belief Languages#933437
- The Fragmentation of Belief#700613
- Can AI Help Us to Understand Belief? Sources, Advances, Limits, and Future Directions#96343
Record · ID 933564
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive