NYU Faculty Digital Archive
metadata only
A Comparative Analysis of the Empirical Validity of Two Rule Based Belief Languages
Rule based expert systems deal with inexact reasoning through a variety of quasi-probabilistic methods, including the widely used certainty factors (CF) and subjective Bayesian (SB) models, versions of which are implemented in many commercial expert system shells. Previous research established t
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE DIALECTS OF THE BAYESIAN BELIEF REVISION LANGUAGE#933566
- Logics for Belief as Maximally Plausible Possibility#702315
- RATIO-SCALE ELICITATION OF DEGREES OF BELIEF#933564
- Norms of Belief and Non-Propositional Primal Beliefs#717649
- A Puzzle about Weak Belief#706573
Record · ID 933437
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive