NYU Faculty Digital Archive
metadata only
ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE DIALECTS OF THE BAYESIAN BELIEF REVISION LANGUAGE
Rule-based expert systems must deal with uncertain data, subjective expert opinions, and inaccurate decision rules. Computer scientists and psychologists have proposed and implemented a number of belief languages widely used in applied systems, and their normative validity is clearly an important
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- A Comparative Analysis of the Empirical Validity of Two Rule Based Belief Languages#933437
- A reusable Bayesian IRT workflow for instrument validation: A tutorial with a small-sample case study in teacher belief measurement#16559
- Reasoning Modeled as a Society of Communicating Experts#244089
- Cliff Tokens: Analyzing Failure Trigger Tokens in LLM Mathematical Reasoning#1129313
- Learning Dynamic Belief Graphs for Theory-of-mind Reasoning#1130178
Record · ID 933566
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive