NYU Faculty Digital Archive
metadata only
Shallow science or meta-cognitive insights: A few thoughts on bibliometrics
As preface to our reactions, we want to thank our colleagues for their insightful and reasoned commentaries on our work and the current state of affairs in bibliometrics. Individually and collectively, they have enhanced our undertaking on bibliometrics by raising issues and posing questions that we
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- The Good, The Bad, and The ChatGPT: a Bibliometric Analysis of its Dominance in Natural Language Processing#228800
- A Bibliometric Analysis of the Cognitive Turn in Psychology#695384
- Beyond Traditional Paradigms: A Bibliometric and Systematic Content Analysis of Quantitative and Qualitative Methodological Innovations in Organisational Psychology#226536
- A bibliometric analysis of large language models in mental health research.#457544
- A bibliometric assessment of the Indian Journal of Psychiatry: Trends, impact, and collaboration (2009-2024).#338312
Record · ID 941865
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive