PhilArchive
open access
The Paradox of Rearmament in a Burning World - Kant & Zizek
As European states ramp up defense spending in anticipation of a possible Russian offensive within the next 2–5 years, they risk eclipsing urgent climate action required in the same time frame to avoid irreversible tipping points. This essay examines this paradox through the moral lens of Immanuel Kant and the ideological critique of Slavoj Žižek. It argues that rearmament may satisfy geopolitical anxieties, but it constitutes both a strategic misallocation and a moral failure when it sidelines humanity’s greater existential threat: climate collapse.
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Life of Schamyl And Narrative of the Circassian War of Independence Against Russia#41506
- The Tensions between ‘Criminal’ and ‘Enemy’ as Categories for Globalized Terrorism#737916
- СЕМЬ ТЕЗИСОВ О СМЫСЛЕ ЖИЗНИ#718246
- War, Structural Injustice, and Global Political Economy: Rethinking Armed Conflict through a Social Justice Perspective#234114
- RUSSIAN AGGRESSION AS A THREAT TO THE SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT OF EUROPE: THE UKRAINIAN DIMENSION#105488
Record · ID 94354
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive