Repositório PUCRS
metadata only
Agrupamento e categorização de documentos jurídicos
In this work we study the use of machine learning (clustering and classification) in judicial decisions search under electronic legal proceedings. We discuss and develop alternatives for precedent clustering, automatically generating classes to use to categorize when a user attaches new documents to
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- A Tool, Not an Author: Limiting Generative AI in Adjudicatory Decisionmaking#1055217
- A Tool, Not an Author: Limiting Generative AI in Adjudicatory Decisionmaking#1055199
- Why a Large Language Model cannot explain itself: Explanation, Justification and Artificial Intelligence in Legal and Administrative Decision-making#695274
- Artificial Intelligence and the Transformation of Humans, Law and Technology Interactions in Judicial Proceedings#964283
- Exploiting LLM-as-a-Judge Disposition on Free Text Legal QA via Prompt Optimization#124088
Record · ID 946433
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive