Repositório PUCRS
metadata only
O dissídio coletivo a luz da emenda constitucional nº 45: reflexos em jurisdição, constitucionalidade, poder normativo e efetividade
This study aims to examine the controversies that sprung from the reform of collective disagreement perpetrated by amendment of Article 114, § 2 of the Federal Constitution, results of the Amendment Constitutional Nº. 45. The objective is define the legal nature of collective disagreement, arbitrage
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- La cláusula de nación más favorecida y su alcance en el plano jurisdiccional en arbitraje de inversiones.#319368
- The Interpretive Authority of Consensus in the Lower Courts#1169548
- Solución de las controversias contractuales mediante el sistema judicial. Problemas y recomendaciones#302231
- The Epistemology of Disagreement#734830
- The Role of Market Power in Vertical-Agreement Doctrine: U.S. Antitrust and EC Competition Law Compared#1061001
Record · ID 947224
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive