Louisiana Tech Digital Commons
metadata only
Exploring the structural relationships between personality and 360-degree feedback
The process of using multiple sources or raters (i.e., self, supervisor, peers, subordinates, and others) in the assessment of managerial performance has been used pervasively in organizations with the primary goal of motivating behavioral change through feedback (Bracken, Timmrick, & Church, 2001).
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Social Comparison Threat and Coping: Affective, Cognitive and Behavioral Outcomes in Response to False Performance-Related Feedback#365374
- Reacting to criticism: What motivates top leaders to respond substantively to negative social performance feedback?#372422
- Ability Knowledge and Epistemic Disadvantage#98545
- Self-Actualization, Self-Image, Vocational Callings, Mental Health#749995
- Feedback with feelings: the human complexity of expressing judgements about performance.#263266
Record · ID 957863
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive