ClinicalTrials.gov
public full text
Public Domain
A Prospective, Randomized Study Comparing Cemented and Cementless Total Knee Replacement
The purpose of this study is to compare the the Nexgen knee replacement system using cementless fixation with the same system using cemented fixation. At minimum 2-year follow-up, the hypothesis is that NexGen total knee arthroplasties using cementless and cemented fixation will demonstrate no differences in clinical outcome based on Oxford and Knee Society scores, patient-assessed visual analog pain, clinical complications, radiographic fixation and implant survivorship.
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Uncemented Tritanium TKR vs Cemented Triathlon TKR#1059903
- Predictors of Poor Outcomes in 1038 Sigma Knees#849675
- Stick Versus Quadricep Exercise for Knee Osteoarthritis#1112205
- Primary Total Knee Arthroplasty Using a Cementless Highly Porous Titanium Tibial Baseplate in Patients Under the Age of 50: An Average 7.6-year Follow-up#635206
- Total Knee Arthroplasty and Clinical Findings#830845
Record · ID 966143
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive