arXiv (All)
open access
Better Understanding, Better Fixes? A Study of Hallucination in LLM-based Automated Program Repair
Large language models (LLMs) have significantly advanced automated program repair (APR), yet existing evaluations remain largely result-centric and provide limited insight into hallucination during repair. In APR, hallucination may arise not only in final patches but also in the intermediate artifac
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Experimental Settings in LLM-Based Program Repair: A Study of Inputs, Tool Access, Feedback, and Validation#1011704
- Experimental Settings in LLM-Based Program Repair: A Study of Inputs, Tool Access, Feedback, and Validation#965480
- Better Understanding, Better Fixes? A Study of Hallucination in LLM-based Automated Program Repair#660882
- A Systematic Literature Review on Automated Program Repair using Large Language Models#432437
- EvidenT: An Evidence-Preserving Framework for Iterative System-Level Package Repair#175353
Record · ID 971568
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive