arXiv (All)
open access
SciDocBench: A Workflow-Centered Benchmark and Data Pipeline for Scientific Document Understanding
Scientific papers require models to reason jointly over text, equations, figures, tables, code, and datasets while preserving the provenance of supporting evidence. Existing benchmarks typically evaluate these capabilities in isolation, leaving unclear whether multimodal models can support realistic
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- SCIRIGOR:Evaluating Open-Ended Scientific Analysis Beyond Final Scores#973792
- SciCode-Verified: How Benchmark Defects Underestimated the Scientific-Coding Ability of Language Models#429402
- Overview of the NLPCC 2026 Shared Task 11: Agent-Based Experiment Reproduction from Scientific Papers#998670
- SciTrue: Reliable Scientific Claim Validation with Frontier and Open Language Models at the NTCIR SciClaimEval Task#820077
- Transcribe, Then Reason: Two-Pass Decomposition for Multimodal Review#1013114
Record · ID 972089
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive