arXiv (All)
open access
LexFlip: A Dissociation Diagnostic for Legal Meaning Preservation Metrics
Does a simplified legal clause still say what the original said? The checks in current use cannot establish that it does: requiring an identical pair to score highest and an unrelated pair lowest moves lexical overlap and legal force together, so any monotone function of token overlap satisfies both
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Linguistic Meaning, Rigid Designators, and Legal Philosophy#1178044
- LexCLiPR: Cross-Lingual Paragraph Retrieval from Legal Judgments#1178507
- Theories of vagueness and theories of law#768036
- An English version of legal maxims : with the original forms, alphabetically arranged, and an index of subjects#334135
- A concordância verbal e nominal no Ensino Médio: entre a norma padrão e a variedade linguística dos estudantes#1135476
Record · ID 972232
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive