arXiv (All)
open access
When Agents Say One Thing and Do Another: Validating Elicited Beliefs from LLMs
Large language models (LLMs) are increasingly deployed in high-stakes settings where good decisions require forming beliefs over the probability of unknown outcomes. However, it is unclear whether LLMs act as if they hold coherent beliefs when making decisions, or if so, how we could validate models
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Uncertainty Quantification for LLM Agents: A Taxonomy, an Evaluation Protocol, and an Empirical Study#984321
- Bias Amplification in Multi-Agent Network: How Biased Agents Shape Opinions and Rhetoric#1012499
- Towards a Belief-Based World Model for LLM Agents#819901
- Towards a Belief-Based World Model for LLM Agents#809905
- Exploring Autonomous Agentic Data Engineering for Model Specialization#800049
Record · ID 974321
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive