arXiv (All)
open access
CABAL: Multi-Agent Simulacra for Tracing the Effects of Collusive Bidding in Peer Review
Recent reports during the AAAI-27 review cycle highlight the risk of reviewers coordinating bids for reciprocal assignment advantage. Prior work treats bidding, reviewer assignment, and review manipulation as separate stages, leaving the lifecycle effects of collusive bidding unclear. Real-world ana
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- The Value of Peer Review and the Reward to Reputation#799001
- The Value of Peer Review and the Reward to Reputation#797587
- Looking for Bidding Teammates: A Game-Theoretic Model of Stranger Collusion in Peer Review#972508
- The peer review system no longer works to guarantee academic rigour – a different approach is needed#443592
- BAFF: Bid-Aware Filter Family for Mitigating Training Data Interference in RTB A/B Tests#986369
Record · ID 974642
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive