arXiv (All)
open access
The Value of Peer Review and the Reward to Reputation
Journals cannot referee every paper they receive. When submissions outrun the time reviewers can give, an editor must decide what to do with the papers no one reads: reject them, or check them with a faster but less accurate tool, of the kind artificial intelligence now supplies. A paper the tool pa
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- The Value of Peer Review and the Reward to Reputation#797587
- Peer review: historical evolution and reviewers' learning.#220934
- AI and the future of academic peer review#232867
- CABAL: Multi-Agent Simulacra for Tracing the Effects of Collusive Bidding in Peer Review#974642
- More Than Mimicking Reviewers: Evaluating LLMs for Pre-Submission Peer Review#973418
Record · ID 799001
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive