arXiv (All)
open access
A Translational Note on AI Safety Evaluation
Recent studies report that automated red-teaming finds more vulnerabilities, at lower cost, than human red-teaming on standard AI safety benchmarks, and some read this as evidence that human evaluators are becoming dispensable. The comparison measures one thing and the conclusion claims another. A b
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- A Red Teaming Framework for Evaluating Robustness of AI-enabled Security Orchestration, Automation, and Response Systems#200419
- Reverse Turing Tests for Human-Machine Task Suitability Assessments Should be Profile-Driven#204160
- Agent Hacks Agent: Autoresearch for Production-Agent Red-Teaming#363161
- PersonaTeaming: Supporting Persona-Driven Red-Teaming for Generative AI#986248
- HumanAgencyBench: Scalable Evaluation of Human Agency Support in AI Assistants#1049671
Record · ID 974685
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive