Grewal v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration)

canada, canadian, case law, court opinion, canlii, fct, 2026fc1159, 2026 fc 1159 (canlii), 2026, fc, 1159, (canlii), imm-601-25, 2026, administrative law, judicial review, reasonableness, vavilov framework, whether officer’s h&c refusal under irpa, s. 25 was unreasonable, decision assessed for justification, transparency and intelligibility, alleged failure to engage contradictory evidence rejected due to lack of corroboration in the record, application for judicial review dismissed, citizenship and immigration, humanitarian and compassionate, best interests of the child, irpa, s. 25, whether officer unreasonably assessed impact on grandchildren’s best interests, primary caregivers identified as parents, no evidence children unable to adjust or maintain relationship from abroad, negative impact not established to warrant an exemption, application for judicial review dismissed, citizenship and immigration, humanitarian and compassionate, establishment and hardship, irpa, s. 25, whether officer unreasonably found insufficient evidence of establishment, hardship, and health, related difficulties in india, representative’s letter treated as uncorroborated assertions, lack of objective documentary evidence and country conditions support, little weight accorded, application for judicial review dismissed, citizenship and immigration, humanitarian and compassionate, alternative immigration avenues, parental sponsorship and super visa, whether it was unreasonable to consider sponsorship and other processes as part of the h&c analysis, applicant raised uncertainty of parental sponsorship, officer addressed available avenues and family willingness to sponsor, factor treated as responsive context, application for judicial review dismissed