CanLIImetadata only
Business Care Corp v Edmonton (City)
canada, canadian, case law, court opinion, canlii, abca, 2026abca295, 2026 abca 295 (canlii), 2026, abca, 295, (canlii), 2603-0070ac, 2026, procedure, appeals, interlocutory relief, rule 14.48 stay application pending appeal from interim costs decision, request to stay “all scheduling mandates, disclosure deadlines, and penalty applications” before the tribunal, “a stay pending appeal can only stay that which has been appealed”, stay dismissed, procedure, appeals, stay of proceedings, whether unappealed scheduling directions and case management directions can be stayed under rule 14.48, stay limited to consequences stemming from the decision under appeal, procedural directions not subject of the appealed costs decision, rule 14.48 not a blanket stay mechanism, stay dismissed, professional responsibility, right of audience, corporate representation, whether a non, lawyer agent may represent a corporation under rule 2.23(4) despite s. 106 of the legal profession act, presumption of lawyer representation considered, economic hardship, relationship, complexity, assistance to court assessed, limited audience granted, procedure, costs, disposition, costs consequences where stay application dismissed and limited audience granted, respondent proposed each party bear its own costs, applicant took no position, direction that each party bear its own costs of these applications, each party to bear its own costs
This document is indexed with metadata only — full text is not available in the archive for this record.
Open the official source ↗
Related documents
Record · ID 976615
Retrieved via
Conceptio — every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.