OSF
open access
The social filtering of reason quality: Evidence from a partisan penalty
When people evaluate another person's view, they sometimes evaluate not only the belief but the reasons offered in its support. These evaluations can come apart: two people can agree on a conclusion and still dismiss each other's reasons as weak or unserious. We tested whether judgments of reason qu
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- A Theory of Post-hoc Debate Judgement#467169
- Relevance and Reason Relations#768576
- Interpretative Disputes, Explicatures, and Argumentative Reasoning#750115
- Disagreement and higher-order evidence#751713
- Two Arguments for Evidentialism#776517
Record · ID 976943
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive