arXiv (All)
open access
Does Rank Still Matter? Position Bias When AI Agents Shop on Our Behalf
Search rankings are valuable because human attention is scarce and sequential. Higher-placed alternatives are easier to find, so they are examined and bought more often. Consumers are now delegating search to AI agents that can ingest an entire results page at once. Randomizing the order of one hund
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- The Attention Cost of Stable Matching#996522
- Rank Confidence Sequences:Anytime-valid Leaderboards#1116542
- Marginal Expected Revenue for Jointly Ranking Auction and Fixed-Price Listings in E-Commerce Sponsored Search#822067
- The Algorithmic Consensus Hypothesis: Systemic Risk in the Age of Uniform AI Driven Markets#126152
- Coding Agents Have Converged: Why the SWE-bench Leaderboard Can No Longer Order Its Top Entries, and What to Measure Instead#1123759
Record · ID 985224
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive