arXiv (All)
open access
What AI Benchmarks Actually Measure: Adapting Convergent and Discriminant Validity to Interrogate Fifty-Six AI Benchmarks
Benchmarks play a central role in the development and governance of models, yet it is often unclear whether they actually measure the concepts they purport to measure (e.g., reasoning, refusal). We adapt convergent and discriminant validity from the social sciences into an approach for interrogating
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Measuring Extremism in the Social Sciences: The Potential of Artificial Intelligence#107524
- Can Large Language Model-Generated Responses Support Assessment Development? A Human-Calibrated Rasch Benchmark#1051552
- A Unified Evaluation Framework for Trustworthy Large Language Models, Agentic AI, and Multimodal Systems#1034793
- Discovering Our Blind Spots and Cognitive Biases in AI Research and Alignment#697194
- ✶ Likelihood Literacy: Why Compatibility Is Not Confirmation#714812
Record · ID 986444
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive