arXiv (All)
open access
Incentives to Offer Algorithmic Recourse
Algorithmic recourse promises to help applicants rejected by automated systems by explaining the changes needed to secure acceptance. What incentive do decision-makers, such as banks and employers, have to offer recourse? We study this question in a screening model in which recourse is both producti
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Greed Is Learned: Visible Incentives as Reward-Hacking Triggers#1155235
- Proceed with Caution#778924
- Intersectional Experiences of Unfair Treatment Caused by Automated Computational Systems#679238
- Algorithmic Indirect Discrimination, Fairness, and Harm#75476
- The Ethical Gravity Thesis: Marrian Levels and the Persistence of Bias in Automated Decision-making Systems#744014
Record · ID 987351
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive