arXiv (All)
open access
Scored vs. Generated Readouts in Behavioral Language Models: An Empirical Study of Elicitation Format
Language models fine-tuned on customer behavior can predict outcomes and generate explanations, but these readouts are often treated as interchangeable. Holding model checkpoint and prompt content fixed, we compare probabilities obtained by scoring answer tokens with predictions generated after a wr
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Systems and methods for dynamic large language model prompt generation — Shopify Inc. (US12182506B2)#607534
- FrugalPrompt: Reducing Contextual Overhead in Large Language Models via Token Attribution#972975
- Prompt-Robust Language Models: Which Training Strategies Work?#821176
- An Analysis of Training-Free Self-Reported Confidence in Language Models#1034355
- Probing Persona-Dependent Preferences in Language Models#1155199
Record · ID 996696
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive