arXiv (All)
open access
How Proper Scoring Rules Shape LLM Forecasting
This paper evaluates how reward function choice shapes the performance and behavior of LLM forecasters. We compare five proper scoring rules as training objectives for binary forecasts of resolved real-world events. Although the rules share the same theoretical incentive for truthful probability rep
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Evaluation Choices Decide the Forecasting Leaderboard: Evidence from a Production Marketplace Panel#1064411
- LSR-Ben: A Logical and Scientific Reasoning Benchmark for Evaluating Process Reward Models#1143744
- Forecast Skill Is Not Decision Skill: Evidence from Weather-Dependent Decision Tasks#971733
- FIFA World Cup 2026 as a Contamination-Free Benchmark for LLM Forecasting Agents: Four Models, a Bookmaker, and 104 Matches#386981
- The Scored Society: Due Process for Automated Predictions#461995
Record · ID 997535
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive