arXiv (All)
open access
Generating is not discovering: a pre-registered physics judge for AI-proposed superconductors, calibrated on six known superconductors and one negative control
Generative models now propose millions of "stable" crystal structures, and their own referees have shown that stability is not discovery; no public benchmark asks whether a candidate has the physics to do a job. For superconductors the job is twofold: to pair, with a definite gap symmetry, and to be
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- DP18792: Experimental Evidence on the Learning Impact of Generative AI#357673
- In-situ tunable superconducting diode: towards field-free operation with infinite nonreciprocity#1156351
- Towards an experimental implementation of entanglement harvesting in superconducting circuits: effect of detector gap variation on entanglement harvesting#1141413
- The Philosophy of Superdeterminism Boosted by Zero-Point Motion Experiment#705114
- 42 U.S.C. § 13477 — High-temperature superconductivity program#589611
Record · ID 997616
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive