arXiv (All)
open access
When do cheap embeddings beat protein language models? A theoretically-grounded hashing sketch for biological sequence classification
\textbf{Motivation:} Pre-trained protein language models (PLMs) such as ESM-2 have become the default representation for biological sequence tasks, but they are computationally heavy and require GPUs both for embedding and for fine-tuning. Whether they are actually necessary for sequence \emph{class
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- PFArena: Benchmarking Language Models for Protein Modification#1076577
- Distilled Rapid Embedding Transfer (DRET): Parameter-Efficient Biomedical Domain Adaptation via Priority-Based Embedding Transfer#925281
- Distilled Rapid Embedding Transfer (DRET): Parameter-Efficient Biomedical Domain Adaptation via Priority-Based Embedding Transfer#921045
- RegimeFormer: A Large Protein Model of Global Perturbation Regimes#1110890
- Amortizing intractable inference in large language models#798540
Record · ID 998062
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive