arXiv (All)
open access
Probing for Knowledge Attribution in Large Language Models
Large language model (LLM) hallucinations, meaning fluent but factually incorrect generations, fall into two types: faithfulness violations, where the model misuses provided context, and factuality violations, where answers reflect errors in internal knowledge. Proper mitigation depends on knowing w
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- PreUnlearn: Auditing Collateral Knowledge Damage Before Large Language Model Unlearning#1051475
- What and Whose Knowledge? Measuring Epistemic Diversity in Large Language Models#799892
- Limits of LLM Text Detectors in Education#1056340
- KUDA: Knowledge Unlearning by Deviating Representation for Large Language Models#1013512
- Not all Negation Cues are Equal: Affixal Negations Yield Better Negation Understanding#1071449
Record · ID 998114
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive