arXiv (All)
open access
Cognitive Amplification vs Cognitive Delegation in Human-AI Systems: A Metric Framework
Artificial intelligence is increasingly embedded in human decision-making, yet distinguishing systems that genuinely amplify human cognition from those promoting excessive dependence remains underdefined. This paper introduces a framework to distinguish cognitive amplification (improving hybrid perf
Conceptio Open Archive
Analyze & explore related research in Conceptio
Connect this record directly into your research workflow or AI agent. Explore citations across open repositories, query full text, and export structured proof bundles.
This document is indexed with metadata only: full text is not available in the archive for this record. Open the official source ↗
Related documents
- Agentic Loafing: An AI Decision Delegation Risk.#409386
- Shaping Opinion: Quantifying the Psychological Impact of Autonomous Multi-Agent LLM Interactions#1141691
- Polycontextural Agent Architectures for Delegated AI: Contextural Accountability Beyond Monolithic AGI#690971
- Unmasking conversational bias in AI multiagent systems.#469335
- Vibe Governance: Why RLHF and RLAIF Cannot Protect Interpretive Sovereignty— and What Replaces Them#90500
Record · ID 998146
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Retrieved via Conceptio: every document is proof-bundled with source, license, and retrieval metadata.
Bring this data into your agent: Connect via MCP or API · 20 free credits to start · no card required
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive
Read the Docs → · View CLI source on GitHub · Conceptio Open Knowledge Archive